Barack Obama and Hillary Rhodman Clinton are fighting, Oh! Are they?
History dominated the start of the ongoing democratic primary campaigns.
Obama to become the first black president and Hillary, the first woman president should either of them gather sufficient delegates and finally take charge of the White House in the November elections.
History dominated the start of the ongoing democratic primary campaigns.
Obama to become the first black president and Hillary, the first woman president should either of them gather sufficient delegates and finally take charge of the White House in the November elections.
It has progressed with much intensity. While the Hillary camp expected to have a run-over Barack Obama, the opposite is rather prevailed so far.
First, the two democrats share spoils. Then Barack Obama, the vibrant speech maker and senator of Illinois, breaks off, winning twelve states in a row.
The Clinton Camp is alarmed.
Any strategy that would halt a run-away Obama was necessary to bring back some life into the Clinton camp.
Done.
They had to be tougher when challenging Obama.
“The man in love with the microphone,” Machinists Union president Tom Buffenbarger started the war.
“He lifts his nose and turns up his ear so he can hear the roar of his adoring crowds. Unlike some, we in the machinists union have seen this act before. He’s damn proud of his performance. But I’m not. All he proved is like Janus, the two faced Roman god… He danced to the tune dictated by billionaires,” Buffenbarger continued.
Clinton then self- declared herself, the candidate who can take up a 3am call.
To this, Obama mildly reacted.
"The question is not about who will be picking up the phone. The question is what kind of judgment will you exercise when you answer the phone."
Obama is an excellent speaker and the Clintons couldn’t stand that fact.
On one of Barack Obama speeches in which a phrase ran close to Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, Hillary Rodham Clinton accused presidential rival Barack Obama of political plagiarism, when she ridiculed him as the candidate of “change you can Xerox.”
Obama toned the accusations down emphasizing, “What we shouldn’t be spending time doing is tearing each other down. We should be spending time lifting the country up.”
Attacks aside: Is this healthy for the party?
While both sides point fingers at each other for fueling the attacks, the Clintons surely would take the much responsibilities of these outcomes.
Remember the Clintons first devised any means possible to halt Obama’s run of 12 straight victories which has in a way helped resurrect their camp.
Many political heads have had concerns with these accusations and counter-accusation, saying its bad for the party as it’s bound to create divisionism come November.
Politics though is never clean. Candidates will do whatever it takes to take charge.
Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean has already admonished Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama to stop attacking one another because it's “demoralizing the party's base and damaging its chances of winning back the White House in November.”
US house speaker, Nancy Pelosi is also concerned.
She has urged both leading Democratic presidential candidates to cease their bickering, warning that the “escalating rhetoric could hurt the party's chances in November.”
Campaigns anywhere in the world are characterized by questions and answers.
The more vibrant and realistic the answers are, the better. Clintons have attacked Obama on several occasions “forcefully but indirectly” demanding answers from the Illinois Senator’s camp.
In politics, when it comes tough, it goes back tough. That’s exactly what is happening in the Democratic race. Nobody can blame Obama for the return assails.
When you get shut by your opponent, you send a cold chill to your followers who are always at your feet for anything that comes out of your mouth.
My university; Makerere University, recently held its biggest political activity of the year. One candidate had just about everything. The party ticket-name-Hall-beauty but the guy was just so mild in everything he did and that cost him big. He lost eventually.
The democratic primaries are going to drag on for as long as either candidate can sustain.
Attacks will not fade.
These candidates have preached just about every reform Americans wanted to hear. The ground now looks more and more level, that personal attacks could provide the only avenue to change things.
The Democratic Party has a reasonable fan base to gain the White House. All that needs to be done is uniting the fans of both sides to rally behind the eventual winner.
I don’t sustain these attacks but in politics, you cannot avoid certain things.
First, the two democrats share spoils. Then Barack Obama, the vibrant speech maker and senator of Illinois, breaks off, winning twelve states in a row.
The Clinton Camp is alarmed.
Any strategy that would halt a run-away Obama was necessary to bring back some life into the Clinton camp.
Done.
They had to be tougher when challenging Obama.
“The man in love with the microphone,” Machinists Union president Tom Buffenbarger started the war.
“He lifts his nose and turns up his ear so he can hear the roar of his adoring crowds. Unlike some, we in the machinists union have seen this act before. He’s damn proud of his performance. But I’m not. All he proved is like Janus, the two faced Roman god… He danced to the tune dictated by billionaires,” Buffenbarger continued.
Clinton then self- declared herself, the candidate who can take up a 3am call.
To this, Obama mildly reacted.
"The question is not about who will be picking up the phone. The question is what kind of judgment will you exercise when you answer the phone."
Obama is an excellent speaker and the Clintons couldn’t stand that fact.
On one of Barack Obama speeches in which a phrase ran close to Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, Hillary Rodham Clinton accused presidential rival Barack Obama of political plagiarism, when she ridiculed him as the candidate of “change you can Xerox.”
Obama toned the accusations down emphasizing, “What we shouldn’t be spending time doing is tearing each other down. We should be spending time lifting the country up.”
Attacks aside: Is this healthy for the party?
While both sides point fingers at each other for fueling the attacks, the Clintons surely would take the much responsibilities of these outcomes.
Remember the Clintons first devised any means possible to halt Obama’s run of 12 straight victories which has in a way helped resurrect their camp.
Many political heads have had concerns with these accusations and counter-accusation, saying its bad for the party as it’s bound to create divisionism come November.
Politics though is never clean. Candidates will do whatever it takes to take charge.
Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean has already admonished Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama to stop attacking one another because it's “demoralizing the party's base and damaging its chances of winning back the White House in November.”
US house speaker, Nancy Pelosi is also concerned.
She has urged both leading Democratic presidential candidates to cease their bickering, warning that the “escalating rhetoric could hurt the party's chances in November.”
Campaigns anywhere in the world are characterized by questions and answers.
The more vibrant and realistic the answers are, the better. Clintons have attacked Obama on several occasions “forcefully but indirectly” demanding answers from the Illinois Senator’s camp.
In politics, when it comes tough, it goes back tough. That’s exactly what is happening in the Democratic race. Nobody can blame Obama for the return assails.
When you get shut by your opponent, you send a cold chill to your followers who are always at your feet for anything that comes out of your mouth.
My university; Makerere University, recently held its biggest political activity of the year. One candidate had just about everything. The party ticket-name-Hall-beauty but the guy was just so mild in everything he did and that cost him big. He lost eventually.
The democratic primaries are going to drag on for as long as either candidate can sustain.
Attacks will not fade.
These candidates have preached just about every reform Americans wanted to hear. The ground now looks more and more level, that personal attacks could provide the only avenue to change things.
The Democratic Party has a reasonable fan base to gain the White House. All that needs to be done is uniting the fans of both sides to rally behind the eventual winner.
I don’t sustain these attacks but in politics, you cannot avoid certain things.
10 Respects:
I really hope Obama wins,but i am really getting tired of the wrangling.Hopefully it doesn't affect the democrats in the long run
I hope you are fine...
dunno much bout d it and all but i want obama to win.
You are right attacks will not fail. And when the nominee is picked, believe me the attacks from the Republican machine is of the worst kind. Karl Rove is rolling his sleeves, and licking his lips.... so wait.
Hey sugar...you got tagged!
How have u been Ed?
hillary got smashed and now she's mad
wow u sure do follow on politics!!!
Well just wan hola and ask for ya vote http://www.blogvilleidol08.blogspot.com/
and if i suck pls feel free to still vote!!! :D
Vote for TEARS!! *winks
Hello my name is Mihai and I am the webmaster of the Nonviolent Radical Party. This days we launched a World Wide Campaign against the bogus trial that is currently underway in Iraq, which most probably will result in a death sentence for Tareq Aziz, number two in Saddam Hussein's decades-long criminal regime. We say “Moratorium on the death penalty also for Tareq Aziz” now!. We are trying to have peoples from the whole world signed this appeal. If you agree with this campaign please sign and maybe put a link on your blog to this World Campaign.
You can sign at www.radicalparty.org
Thank you and excuse me.
Hope all is well. Do update soon...
Post a Comment